Scripts
Linear A
LIN-ee-ur AY
Also Known As Class A
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin from 1800 BCE
Linear A was the writing system of the Minoan civilization of Bronze Age Crete, in use from roughly the nineteenth to the fifteenth century BCE. It is generally believed to combine syllabic signs with logograms and numerals, though this classification itself rests on inference rather than proof, because Linear A has never been deciphered. About seventy percent of its signs reappear, with new phonetic values, in the later Linear B script that Mycenaean Greeks adapted from it, but Linear A's own underlying language, conventionally called Minoan, remains unidentified and unclassified.
Facts
DirectionalityUsually written left to right, though a handful of documents used right-to-left or boustrophedon direction. 1 In Use Since (Year)Sources vary slightly: some place the start around 1850 BCE, others around 1800 BCE. All agree on an end date around 1450 BCE. Open Questions
Script TypeBelieved to combine syllabic signs with logograms and numerals, the working assumption in the field, but this classification rests on inference rather than proof, since the script and its underlying language are undeciphered. Learn More
The Script Nobody Can Read: Linear A and the Missing Language of Crete
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Linear A is not a mystery for lack of material. Archaeologists have recovered clay tablets, seals and inscribed objects bearing the script from sites across Bronze Age Crete, enough that its roughly ninety signs and their rough sound values can be estimated with some confidence. The mystery is what those sounds spell. Because Linear A was later adapted, with new phonetic values, into Linear B, which does record an identifiable language, Mycenaean Greek, scholars have tried reading Linear A backward through Linear B's known sign values. The results do not resolve into any known language, ancient or otherwise, and the underlying tongue, conventionally called Minoan, remains unclassified. That has not stopped proposals: Leonard Palmer suggested a Luwian or other Anatolian language in 1958, a theory that has lost support over time; Cyrus Gordon argued in the 1960s for a Semitic identification, pointing to resemblances with Akkadian and Canaanite that most specialists consider too thin to be conclusive; other scholars have floated Etruscan or Hurrian connections. None has won broad acceptance. Linear A remains a genuinely open case in the field, not a puzzle waiting for one more clever idea so much as a script whose underlying language may simply have left no other trace for comparison.
Ninety Signs In Common: What Linear A and Linear B Share, and What They Do Not
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Roughly seventy percent of Linear A's signs reappear in Linear B, which is exactly why the relationship between the two scripts is so well established even though one of them remains completely unread. When Mycenaean Greeks began administering Crete, they seem to have taken over Linear A's existing sign shapes rather than invent a new script from nothing, but they assigned many of those signs new phonetic values fitted to Greek, added some signs Linear A did not have, and dropped others. The result is a script that looks like a close cousin of Linear A at a glance and reads completely differently in practice. This is also exactly why Linear A cannot simply be read using Linear B's values: a shared sign shape between the two scripts is no guarantee of a shared sound, since the Mycenaean adapters were free to repurpose signs however suited their own language. Linear B tablets, once deciphered, turned out to record dry palace administration, inventories of grain, wool, and labor rather than literature or history. Whether Linear A, when it was actively used for Minoan administration a few centuries earlier, served a similarly narrow bureaucratic purpose, or something broader, is one more question its undeciphered status leaves open.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Ancestor Of
Linear B, Scripts Roughly seventy percent of Linear A signs reappear in Linear B, adapted with new phonetic values for Greek; Linear A itself remains undeciphered.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
What language does Linear A encode?
Linear A has never been deciphered. Roughly seventy percent of its signs reappear in Linear B with known phonetic values, but Linear A itself used those same signs for a different, unidentified language, conventionally called Minoan, which cannot be confidently linked to any known language family.
What would resolve this A substantial bilingual inscription pairing Linear A with a known deciphered script or language, or a breakthrough matching its sign values to a specific language family with broad scholarly acceptance, neither of which exists today.
Aegean philology and historical linguisticsAeon Essays: Without a Rosetta Stone, can linguists decipher Minoan script?
Dissenting Readings (2 dissenting readings)
Script Type
Gordon argued in 1966 and 1969 that Linear A elements resemble Akkadian and Canaanite, proposing a Semitic identification for the underlying Minoan language, a position most specialists consider inconclusive for lack of solid linguistic evidence.
A dissenting reading, from Cyrus GordonAeon Essays: Without a Rosetta Stone, can linguists decipher Minoan script?, Aeon Media
Script Type
Palmer proposed in 1958 that Linear A recorded a Luwian or other Anatolian language, a hypothesis that has lost support over time as more Anatolian-language data became available, though it remains part of the unresolved debate over Minoan identity.
A dissenting reading, from Leonard PalmerAeon Essays: Without a Rosetta Stone, can linguists decipher Minoan script?, Aeon Media
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.